<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tom DeLay Attacks John McCain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forthardknox.com/2008/02/07/tom-delay-attacks-john-mccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forthardknox.com/2008/02/07/tom-delay-attacks-john-mccain/</link>
	<description>Politically-Conservative Web 2.0 Activists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:10:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Slatter</title>
		<link>http://forthardknox.com/2008/02/07/tom-delay-attacks-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-5369</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Slatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forthardknox.com/2008/02/07/tom-delay-attacks-john-mccain/#comment-5369</guid>
		<description>[...] Tom Delay (has obvious credibility issues, in my opinion, yet is a poster child for the Republican party) in an interview the other day when asked if he would vote for McCain just so the Clinton&#8217;s wouldn&#8217;t be back in the House. He said that he didn&#8217;t know which would be more dangerous as well as intimating that he might set out of the voting because of McCain (Watch HERE and HERE). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tom Delay (has obvious credibility issues, in my opinion, yet is a poster child for the Republican party) in an interview the other day when asked if he would vote for McCain just so the Clinton&#8217;s wouldn&#8217;t be back in the House. He said that he didn&#8217;t know which would be more dangerous as well as intimating that he might set out of the voting because of McCain (Watch HERE and HERE). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Slatter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Third Party failure</title>
		<link>http://forthardknox.com/2008/02/07/tom-delay-attacks-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-4792</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Slatter &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Third Party failure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forthardknox.com/2008/02/07/tom-delay-attacks-john-mccain/#comment-4792</guid>
		<description>[...] Tom Delay (has obvious credibility issues, in my opinion, yet is a poster child for the Republican party) in an interview the other day when asked if he would vote for McCain just so the Clinton&#8217;s wouldn&#8217;t be back in the House. He said that he didn&#8217;t know which would be more dangerous as well as intimating that he might set out of the voting because of McCain (Watch HERE and HERE). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tom Delay (has obvious credibility issues, in my opinion, yet is a poster child for the Republican party) in an interview the other day when asked if he would vote for McCain just so the Clinton&#8217;s wouldn&#8217;t be back in the House. He said that he didn&#8217;t know which would be more dangerous as well as intimating that he might set out of the voting because of McCain (Watch HERE and HERE). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflection &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Third Party failure</title>
		<link>http://forthardknox.com/2008/02/07/tom-delay-attacks-john-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-4062</link>
		<dc:creator>Reflection &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Third Party failure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forthardknox.com/2008/02/07/tom-delay-attacks-john-mccain/#comment-4062</guid>
		<description>[...] I read something by Newt Gingrich (the leader of the conservative takeover in &#8216;94) say that he does not like McCain at all because of some of the things that McCain has brought about, but would still vote for McCain because fighting McCain 20% of the time is a lot better than fight either of the Dem&#8217;s 90% of the time. Tom Delay (has obvious credibility issues, in my opinion, yet is a poster child for the Republican party) in an interview the other day when asked if he would vote for McCain just so the Clinton&#8217;s wouldn&#8217;t be back in the House. He said that he didn&#8217;t know which would be more dangerous as well as intimating that he might set out of the voting because of McCain (Watch HERE and HERE). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I read something by Newt Gingrich (the leader of the conservative takeover in &#8216;94) say that he does not like McCain at all because of some of the things that McCain has brought about, but would still vote for McCain because fighting McCain 20% of the time is a lot better than fight either of the Dem&#8217;s 90% of the time. Tom Delay (has obvious credibility issues, in my opinion, yet is a poster child for the Republican party) in an interview the other day when asked if he would vote for McCain just so the Clinton&#8217;s wouldn&#8217;t be back in the House. He said that he didn&#8217;t know which would be more dangerous as well as intimating that he might set out of the voting because of McCain (Watch HERE and HERE). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
