Judgepedia

March 29, 2008 by Jenn Sierra  
Filed under News and Opinion

In January, we posted about Ballotpedia.org, which is a wiki about citizen initiatives (petition drives, ballot access legislation, etc.). Well, now the Sam Adams has rolled out a related beta, called Judgepedia:

Judgepedia is an online encyclopedia that strives to be a consummate source for authoritative articles, open and respectful discourse, and reputable research for all things judicial. Because Judgepedia works like any other Wiki, we encourage the contribution and discussion of anyone who wishes to speak honestly about the role of the judiciary in America. Your support and collaboration are enthusiastically encouraged.

The wiki is still in beta stage, so there is not as much content there right now as there will be soon, but what is there so far is great info. The site uses MediaWiki, which is the same software used by Wikipedia, so anyone familiar with Wikipedia will be comfortable moving around here.

The site is broken down into State Hubs and State Supreme Courts. One of the currently-popular pages in the State Hubs is the page of Judge Michael Gableman, who is a Circuit Court Judge in Burnett County, Wisconsin, who is known as a “traditionalist.” Judgepedia provides a brief bio, information about his early career, awards, memberships, and civics acivities, campaign, news, issues, and endorsements.

In the State Supreme Courts Hubs, the most popular page right now is the Louisiana Supreme Court:

The Louisiana Supreme Court has its judicial roots in 18th century French and Spanish governments.

There is information about the jurisdiction of the court, the Roman, and French influence, and the Alcades and Regidors. There is also information about the history of the court, the current justices, and how they can be removed.

Good info. Check it out.

Speak Your Mind


This comment section is for the readers of Ft. Hard Knox, a place for political conservatives to share information about online activism. We are not "fair and balanced," and we aren't refereeing a "free speech zone." Intelligent, funny, and on-topic comments are welcome. Trolls, spam, and liberal propaganda are not. We may occassionally approve a comment with an obvious lefty-slant so that we can amuse ourselves by making fun of it, but most will be deleted. (Why? Because we're busy, we have lives, and when we want to talk to you we'll go visit you on Digg or the Daily KOS.)

This is a private blog, and we reserve the right to make up our own rules as we go along. The few comments which manage to squeak by our censors reflect the opinion of the commentator, and not necessarily the staff of Ft. Hard Knox.

Hint: One sure-fire way to get your comment sent directly to the "spam" folder is to call us "racists" for disagreeing with a policy of the current POTUS or speaking out against terrorism.

Your photo will display with your comment if you use gravatars.

Bad Behavior has blocked 1968 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Login