Clarification: We are electing a ‘President of the United States’ this year, not a ‘Ruler of the World.’

April 15, 2008 by Jenn Sierra  
Filed under News

Yes, the United States’ President is often referred to as the “Leader of the Free World,” but that doesn’t actually mean that the entire world gets to vote for him or her. At least it’s not supposed to mean that, according to our laws.

Billary and Snob-ama seem to think otherwise. For years, the Clinton campaigns have been riddled with accusations of inappropriately accepting laundered campaign funds from communist China.

Now, Judicial Watch has posted on The Hill’s Congress Blog:

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it filed a formal complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) related to a fundraising concert by musician Sir Elton John on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. Elton John, a foreign national, is prohibited by federal law, from making any contribution to a federal, state or local election campaign.

To read Judicial Watch’s FEC complaint in its entirety, please click here.

As for Obama, Melanie Morgan reported Friday in WorldNetDaily, that he is now sharing in the spoils of money donated through Code Pink with Islamic terrorists in Fallujah and Pakistan, as well as Castro and Chavez, through a process called “bundling”:

Campaign documents released by the Federal Elections Commission reveal that the anti-military activist is involved in a bundling operation for the Obama for President campaign.

Bundling allows a designated individual or organization to bypass campaign finance limits by collecting the contributions of others and “bundling” them together.

[...]

The organization traveled to Iraq to give $600,000 in aid to what they called “the other side” so they could resist Coalition Forces. The “other side” is a euphemism for Islamic terrorists. But remember, according to the worldview of Barack Hussein Obama, these terrorists have nothing to do with the jihad that’s been declared against America.

Kicked out of Pakistan after protesting the Pakistani governments efforts to combat the jihadists operating in that country, Code Pink’s leaders have also been some of the strongest proponents of former Cuban dictator Fidel Castro’s regime…Perhaps [Obama can explain] the photograph below. It shows the anti-American thug president of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, with his arms around Barack Hussein Obama fundraising bundler Jodie Evans.

Catherine Moy reported in Human events yesterday:

The donations have raised questions about Obama’s association with the more radical elements of his base. Code Pink has harassed, vandalized and impeded military recruiters across the United States in a campaign it calls “counter-recruitment.” The group also gave $600,000 to the families of Iraqi terrorists in Fallujah, whom it called “insurgents” fighting for their homes.

Enough is enough. It’s time to take our election back. We’re not electing a ruler of the world - we’re electing a President of the United States.


Also see: Does Obama think he’s running for President of the U.S., or Ruler of the World?

Comments & Trackbacks

5 Responses to “Clarification: We are electing a ‘President of the United States’ this year, not a ‘Ruler of the World.’”

Trackbacks

  1. Obama “flattered” by Hamas’ Endorsement…?!
  2. Naivety In Obama Camp or A Socialist Plan for America?
  3. Why is Obama Campaigning in Germany? (Updated)
_____________________________________________________________

Comments

  1. TRM on April 16th, 2008 7:05 am

    “we’re electing a President of the United States.”

    I think I am going to have to disagree… we should be electing a POTUS,, instead we are choosing which revolver to put in our mouth…

  2. Jenn Sierra on April 16th, 2008 7:34 am

    Sadly, TRM, it does feel a little bit like that…considering our alternative to these two clowns is a Soros-funded RINO.

_____________________________________________________________

This comment section is for the readers of Ft. Hard Knox, a place for political conservatives to share information about online activism. We are not "fair and balanced," and we aren't refereeing a "free speech zone." Intelligent, funny, and on-topic comments are welcome. Trolls, spam, and liberal propaganda are not. We may occassionally approve a comment with an obvious lefty-slant so that we can amuse ourselves by making fun of it, but most will be deleted. (Why? Because we're busy, we have lives, and when we want to talk to you we'll go visit you on Digg or the Daily KOS.)

This is a private blog, and we reserve the right to make up our own rules as we go along. The few comments which manage to squeak by our censors reflect the opinion of the commentator, and not necessarily the staff of Ft. Hard Knox.

...and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!





Bad Behavior has blocked 4149 access attempts in the last 7 days.