Politically-Conservative Web 2.0 Activists

Ft. Hard Knox

April 21st, 2008 at 12:44 am

Another Real World Physics Lesson for “Truthers”

It’s time to give “truthers” another lesson in real world physics.

“Truthers” often insist that it is impossible to move more with less.  Yet, things like levers, pulleys, etc. allow one to do exactly that.   That tire jack that’s light enough for you to lift out of the trunk quite easily can lift up your car, no problem, something a person can’t do.   I weigh considerably less then my car, yet I can push it, no problem.  The fact that the car has wheels does not change the fact that it’s more massive than I am.

Now, since “truthers” are going to want me explain how the mass of the upper floors were able to move the much larger mass of the lower ones, it’s a little thing called force.

According to Newton’s 2nd Law of motion force is mass times acceleration, which is written as F = ma (source).  Mass does not move mass, force does.   Now, obviously, the collapsing upper floors had both mass and acceleration, and therefore force. The thing is, until the upper floors made contact with the lower ones, the lower floors had mass, but weren’t moving- YOU CAN’T HAVE ACCELERATION WITHOUT MOTION. If force equals mass times acceleration, and the lower floors aren’t moving, then, clearly there’s no force. Now, when the upper floors hit the lower floors, the lower floors would of course exert equal force on the upper floors, per Newton’s 3rd Law of motion.

The thing is there’s one other force the collapsing Twin Towers had to contend with- the force of gravity. That’s right, gravity is a force. How do I know that?  It’s really quite simple.  If I drop a 65 gram tennis ball, we have mass (the 65 grams) and gravity accelerates the tennis ball at a rate of 9.8 m/s(2).  Since we have both mass and acceleration, gravity clearly fits the definition of force.

Now, as for the speed of gravity, “truthers” tend to missapply it in the case of the WTC collapse. In the case of the Twin Towers, it’s more accurate to use ACCELERATION DUE TO GRAVITY, which is 9.8 m/s(2) for the earth. Oh, and just for the record, acceleration is NOT the same as velocity.  As we see from the definition given here, “acceleration is defined as the ratio of change in velocity to the time interval over which the change occurs.” Hint: this means acceleration is NOT the same as velocity, although they are related.

On a different, but similar note, speed and velocity are NOT the same either. For example, say you’re driving down the freeway with a friend and your friend asks how fast you’re going. If you say you’re going 70 MPH, that’s speed. If you say you’re going 70 MPH due north, that’s velocity. Simply put, speed doesn’t have a direction, velocity does- any physics book will tell you that.

Finally, since “truthers” have trouble keeping these straight, force, potential energy, and load capacity are NOT the same thing.  

First, as we see from the quote here, load capacity is defined as “The weight that a building’s floors can support, generally measured per square foot.”

This quote gives the following definition of potential energy:

Potential energy, or stored energy, is the ability of a system to do work due to its position or internal structure. For example, gravitational potential energy is a stored energy determined by an object’s position in a gravitational field while elastic potential energy is the energy stored in a spring.

To put this in layman’s terms, if I take a tennis ball and hold it in my hand 3 feet off the ground, that’s potential energy; an object must be stationary to have potential energy.

Last but not least, as I pointed out at the beginning of this article, force equals mass times acceleration, which means in order to have force, one must have motion.

In short, when it comes to physics, members of the 9-11 “Truth” Movement have been watching far too many Roadrunner cartoons.

Also see: Real Physics vs. Wile. E. Coyote Physics

               

1
  • 1

    [...] Continuing from my previous article, here are some more real world physics for “truthers,” as opposed to the Wile E. Coyote [...]

  •  

    boycottAPmini

     


     

     

    Who are the FHK Collaborators**?

     

     

  • Popular on FHK

    Web 2.0 Info

    How to talk to a "truther," if you must.

    Right Videos

    WWF Facebook Group

    FHK on YouTube

    Web 2.0 Wiki


    TXPoet's 'Ghost Ranger' on BTR

    Thursdays, 10PM (CST)

     


     

    ...also watch for:

    The WebWarriors of Ft. Hard Knox (WWF) will be offering a series of Web2.0 workshops online.

     

    Update 06/24/08: Survey #2 Results

     

  • FHK Blog Honor Roll

     

    Where's the Blogroll?!

     

    Obama: America's Biggest Mistake Waiting to Be Made

    Understanding "the American Jewish" vote is a subject that simply makes me crazy. I understand that as families, and groups of peoples, we tend to vote as did those we grew up with, conversed often with, loved and respected...(Maggie's Notebook)

     

    An Interview With Kathleen Parker, Author Of "Save The Males"

    John: Now, the average left-wing feminist response to your book is probably akin to, "Ah, men have the advantage in every way. Why would anyone need to 'save the males?'" What would you say to that? Kathleen: You're exactly right. I get a lot of that and what they point out generally is that men head most of the corporations and men dominate in the Congress. While that is statistically true, what I try to do in Save the Males is show where our current trends are leading...(Right Wing News)

     

     

    I Demand...

    I demand the government make certain I have a roof over my head every day of my life, even if I have done nothing personally to earn it. I demand the government make certain I always have food to eat, even if I have sat on my ass and done nothing for it...I am today's youth...Are you listening? (Kenders' Musings)

     

     

    Blog Honor Roll Archive

     


     

    rss1.jpg
    technorati

     

  • Sponsor* FHK

     

     

     

     


     

    x-click-butcc-donate1.gif

     


     

     

     


    *The opinions of our collaborators, sponsors and guest authors, expressed on FHK or elsewhere on the web, do not necessarily reflect the opinion of FHK. We appreciate, however, their contributions and widely-varying perspectives on an impressive variety of topics.