Socialist “Curriculum” cannot penetrate home schools…therefore, they must be outlawed. (Updated - Corporate America Agrees)

May 25, 2008 by Jenn Sierra  
Filed under Uncategorized

(Updated) Michelle Malkin reports, “The Subway sandwich corporation is holding a story-writing contest for kids. You can win athletic equipment, gift baskets, or sandwich shop cash cards. Except if you’re a homeschooled student…

In the fine print at the bottom of the contest information:

NO PURCHASE NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN. Contest is open only to legal residents of the Untied [sic] States who are currently over the age of 18 and have children who attend elementary, private or parochial schools that serve grades PreK-6. No home schools will be accepted.

Doctor’s Associates Inc., which owns and operates Subway, typifies an American corporation with an international bent toward subverting the U.S. Constitution and acting as socialism’s change agent. Don’t believe it? Check out its “Helping Society” page, outlining its “diversity” and “going green” policies, as well as it’s commitment to to only dealing with “business partners” adhere to the same practices.

Also see:

 


(Original Post 5/19/08) Rob Shearer, of Contending with the Culture, reports:

The Tennessee Department of Education has recently defended its decision not to recognize homeschool diplomas with the assertion that because they were prohibited from having anything to do with the selection of a curriculum, teachers, or textbooks…(more)

That word, “curriculum” is a little-understood word that has been used to change the public school system in the last 100 years. As I wrote, in What Happened to the New England Primer and a Slateboard?, during the early part of the 20th century, the subject of curriculum development changed from a study for “curricularists,” who specialized in general curriculum development for colleges and universities to a field of educational psychology, according to Marshall, Sears and Schubert, in their Turning Points in Curriculum (pp. 19-20).

Jerome Bruner, a leader in the field of cognitive studies, published his book, Process of Education, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1961) was instrumental in turning the field of curriculum development into a forum on how children and adults learn, and how educators can shape public thought.


When we understand the cognitive processes, we will certainly be able to design education that will use man’s potential for learning far more effectively than it has been used before.

This change in the role of education along with the legal “civil rights” precedents opened the door for today’s political and social activists of every persuasion to begin utilizing the national curriculum to push various social agendas.

“Curriculum” (see some popular definitions, here) does not refer to the traditional three “R’s” (Reading, wRiting, and aRithmetic), being taught in the schools. It applies to a systematic learning program. It refers to the overall framework and ideology in which all of the learning content is presented to the students. Social activists in the public school system can easily indoctrinate the state’s children with their ideas in a state-sponsored “curriculum.” They cannot, do this, in a home, where the parents are choosing the so-called “curriculum,” and usually incorporating their family’s values into the courses being taught and learned there.

That is why the state has such a problem with home schooling. If the concern were over whether or not the children were learning what they need to learn, this could easily be solved (and has been solved in many states) with standardized testing for homeschoolers. But we know that is not the concern. German homeschooling parents have been coming under fire for some time, as reported by the Home School Legal Defense Association, and closer to home, Californians have also had an uphill battle. Now, Tennessee. No, the “curricularists” in Tennessee feel children should be in the public schools, so that they have full access to what Doug Giles is calling, “Memphis High School: Reading, Writing and Bumping & Grinding.”

Hat-Tip, Blue Collar Muse

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. [...] Ft. Hard Knox; “Curriculum” (see some popular definitions, here) does not refer to the traditional three [...]

  2. TENNESSEE: HOME SCHOOL DIPLOMA = GARBAGE

    Blue Collar Muse tells us;
    Recently, the Tennessee State Board of Education ruled diplomas issued to home-schooled students from religious based schools were invalid as proof of the successful completion of High School should it be presented for emplo…

  3. [...] Socialist “Curriculum” cannot penetrate home schools…therefore … [...]

  4. [...] Why, here comes one now: Socialist “Curriculum” cannot penetrate home schools…therefore, they must be outlawed. (Update… [...]

  5. Subway Discriminates Against Home Schoolers

    This is an outrage. Here is the phone number and address of Subway Corporation:

    Subway Franchise Headquarters
    325 Bic Drive
    Milford, CT 06461-3059
    800 888-4848

    Let them know that they may allow discrimination in the “Untied States” but not t…



Comments

9 Responses to “Socialist “Curriculum” cannot penetrate home schools…therefore, they must be outlawed. (Updated - Corporate America Agrees)”
  1. O’BORG’ama in 08, Subway votes assimilate!

  2. Perhaps a letter writing effort to Subway asking why might bring some pressure on them!
    http://www.subway.com/Applications/CustService/frmCustomerService.aspx

  3. Ron Ron says:

    I just sent Subway a comment via their website telling them that so long as they discriminate against home schooled children they will not have my business.

  4. Dear sports:

    All PC Left Liberalism tends to bloat and collapse via its own internal contradictions. It is in short, endless logical fallacy via cognitive dissonance.

    They state as a premise “…that the organization and the individuals within it are against any type of discrimination against employees on the basis of race, sex, creed, religion, color or national origin”.

    So the company “…is committed to taking positive steps towards increasing the representation of women and minorities in business and the work force in general”.

    Thus they ARE discriminating regards particular groups in word and deed. They are either phony, liars, stupid or very clever opportunists, as is the way. Or all four.

    Why not say Subway “…is committed to taking positive steps towards increasing the representation of everyone equally”. Which would be the perfectly monstrous and menaingless levelling fantasy of the Socialist vanity bunko artist. It is often more about the correct image that is merely good for business.

    But er, many large business’s are afraid of the fashion for irrationally despising them, and they cannot bring themselves to state things plainly, and kinda want it both ways.

    Creepy really. Colonel Neville.

Speak Your Mind


This comment section is for the readers of Ft. Hard Knox, a place for political conservatives to share information about online activism. We are not "fair and balanced," and we aren't refereeing a "free speech zone." Intelligent, funny, and on-topic comments are welcome. Trolls, spam, and liberal propaganda are not. We may occassionally approve a comment with an obvious lefty-slant so that we can amuse ourselves by making fun of it, but most will be deleted. (Why? Because we're busy, we have lives, and when we want to talk to you we'll go visit you on Digg or the Daily KOS.)

This is a private blog, and we reserve the right to make up our own rules as we go along. The few comments which manage to squeak by our censors reflect the opinion of the commentator, and not necessarily the staff of Ft. Hard Knox.

...and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

Bad Behavior has blocked 2429 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Login