Energy Guzzled by Al Gore’s Home in Past Year Could Power 232 U.S. Homes for a Month (Gore’s personal electricity consumption is up 10%, despite “energy-efficient” home renovations.)

June 18, 2008 by forthardknox  
Filed under Uncategorized

Goracle…from the Tennessee Center for Policy Research:

In the year since Al Gore took steps to make his home more energy-efficient, the former Vice President’s home energy use surged more than 10%, according to the Tennessee Center for Policy Research. Drew Johnson, President of the Tennesee Center for Policy Research said:

A man’s commitment to his beliefs is best measured by what he does behind the closed doors of his own home. Al Gore is a hypocrite and a fraud when it comes to his commitment to the environment, judging by his home energy consumption. Actions speak louder than words, and Gore’s actions prove that he views climate change not as a serious problem, but as a money-making opportunity. Gore is exploiting the public’s concern about the environment to line his pockets and enhance his profile.”

In the past year, Gore’s home burned through 213,210 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity, enough to power 232 average American households for a month.

In February 2007, An Inconvenient Truth, a film based on a climate change speech developed by Gore, won an Academy Award for best documentary feature. The next day, the Tennessee Center for Policy Research uncovered that Gore’s Nashville home guzzled 20 times more electricity than the average American household.

After the Tennessee Center for Policy Research exposed Gore’s massive home energy use, the former Vice President scurried to make his home more energy-efficient. Despite adding solar panels, installing a geothermal system, replacing existing light bulbs with more efficient models, and overhauling the home’s windows and ductwork, Gore now consumes more electricity than before the “green” overhaul.

Since taking steps to make his home more environmentally-friendly last June, Gore devours an average of 17,768 kWh per month –1,638 kWh more energy per month than before the renovations – at a cost of $16,533. By comparison, the average American household consumes 11,040 kWh in an entire year, according to the Energy Information Administration.

In the wake of becoming the most well-known global warming alarmist, Gore won an Oscar, a Grammy and the Nobel Peace Prize. In addition, Gore saw his personal wealth increase by an estimated $100 million thanks largely to speaking fees and investments related to global warming hysteria.

The Tennessee Center for Policy Research, a Nashville-based free market think tank and watchdog organization, obtained information about Gore’s home energy use through a public records request to the Nashville Electric Service.

Also see: WTH on the Publius Forum

Hat-Tip Leslie, of State Sunshine and Open Records

Also see: Inconvenient and Inconvenienter

Comments & Trackbacks

2 Responses to “Energy Guzzled by Al Gore’s Home in Past Year Could Power 232 U.S. Homes for a Month (Gore’s personal electricity consumption is up 10%, despite “energy-efficient” home renovations.)

Trackbacks

_____________________________________________________________

Comments

  1. Victor Chabala on June 19th, 2008 7:53 am

    Will find and post the link later, but if you go to Snopes.com, you’ll find that Bush’s Crawford ranch house is far more environmentally friendly than Gore’s mansion

  2. Jenn Sierra on June 19th, 2008 8:11 am

    Thanks, Vic…I’d forgotten all about that! We linked to that Snopes article several months ago, here. I’ve added the link to that previous article to this post, as well.

    Thanks, again.

    Jenn

_____________________________________________________________

This comment section is for the readers of Ft. Hard Knox, a place for political conservatives to share information about online activism. We are not "fair and balanced," and we aren't refereeing a "free speech zone." Intelligent, funny, and on-topic comments are welcome. Trolls, spam, and liberal propaganda are not. We may occassionally approve a comment with an obvious lefty-slant so that we can amuse ourselves by making fun of it, but most will be deleted. (Why? Because we're busy, we have lives, and when we want to talk to you we'll go visit you on Digg or the Daily KOS.)

This is a private blog, and we reserve the right to make up our own rules as we go along. The few comments which manage to squeak by our censors reflect the opinion of the commentator, and not necessarily the staff of Ft. Hard Knox.

...and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!





Bad Behavior has blocked 6415 access attempts in the last 7 days.