The DNC: A Night of Political Soap Opera
August 28, 2008 by Phyllis Chesler
Filed under News/Op-Ed
It was an evening of political soap opera. Senator Biden’s wife, Senator Obama’s wife, each wept a little in their seats. Biden and his son hugged each other. In full view, both Democratic candidates kissed the other candidates’ female relatives. And although the speakers at the DNC got one rousing ovation after the other, even though I myself was sometimes moved by the theatrical tactics-the platitudes did not move me so much as sadden me. The speeches were fraught with promises which bore no relationship to reality and which failed to deal with the existential peril to America posed by Islamic jihad.
The only speaker who even remotely touched upon this was Senator Biden who only once mentioned dangerous “fundamentalism in Afghanistan and Pakistan”-as if al Qaeda, Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood, Islamic Jihad, etc. do not exist world-wide. President Clinton ignored this very Islamist threat when it might still have been contained. It now exists on every continent and it became so on his watch.
Both President Clinton and Senator Biden were charismatic speakers. Biden mainly presented himself as a family man, whose track record as a brave and caring single father was and is exemplary. Biden also praised his white-haired mother, (who was present), and his father, (who has since gone on to his final reward). Both parents had taught “Joey” Biden to “pick himself up after he was knocked down.” Biden’s gratitude and love for his parents and for his children and grandchildren was sincere and moving…Continue reading on Chesler Chronicles >>


![[del.icio.us]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Facebook]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[Fark]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/fark.png)
![[Google]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/google.png)
![[Mixx]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/mixx.png)
![[MySpace]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/myspace.png)
![[Newsvine]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/newsvine.png)
![[Propeller]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/propeller.png)
![[Reddit]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/reddit.png)
![[Slashdot]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/slashdot.png)
![[Sphere]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/sphere.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Twitter]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)
![[Yahoo!]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/yahoo.png)
![[Email]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)




They will not name the evil, what are they afraid of? Losing Muslim votes? When you give name to an evil, you diminish its power. So let us call it what it is: Islamic Jihad.
I’m with you, Katie. I have a real problem with calling it “fundamentalism,” because anyone who really believes and follows any philosophy is a “fundamentalist” of that philosophy, whether it be Christianity, homeopathic medicine, wildlife conservation, pastafarianism, or whatever. That doesn’t necessarily make that person dangerous (weird, in some cases, but possibly harmless).
If that philosophy happens to be “Islamic Jihad,” though, then we have a problem. The problem is Islamic Jihad, not the “fundamentalism.”