The DNC: A Night of Political Soap Opera

August 28, 2008 by Phyllis Chesler  
Filed under News/Op-Ed

It was an evening of political soap opera. Senator Biden’s wife, Senator Obama’s wife, each wept a little in their seats. Biden and his son hugged each other. In full view, both Democratic candidates kissed the other candidates’ female relatives. And although the speakers at the DNC got one rousing ovation after the other, even though I myself was sometimes moved by the theatrical tactics-the platitudes did not move me so much as sadden me. The speeches were fraught with promises which bore no relationship to reality and which failed to deal with the existential peril to America posed by Islamic jihad.

The only speaker who even remotely touched upon this was Senator Biden who only once mentioned dangerous “fundamentalism in Afghanistan and Pakistan”-as if al Qaeda, Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood, Islamic Jihad, etc. do not exist world-wide. President Clinton ignored this very Islamist threat when it might still have been contained. It now exists on every continent and it became so on his watch.

Both President Clinton and Senator Biden were charismatic speakers. Biden mainly presented himself as a family man, whose track record as a brave and caring single father was and is exemplary. Biden also praised his white-haired mother, (who was present), and his father, (who has since gone on to his final reward). Both parents had taught “Joey” Biden to “pick himself up after he was knocked down.” Biden’s gratitude and love for his parents and for his children and grandchildren was sincere and moving…Continue reading on Chesler Chronicles >>

Comments

2 Responses to “The DNC: A Night of Political Soap Opera”
  1. Katie says:

    They will not name the evil, what are they afraid of? Losing Muslim votes? When you give name to an evil, you diminish its power. So let us call it what it is: Islamic Jihad.

  2. forthardknox Jenn Sierra says:

    I’m with you, Katie. I have a real problem with calling it “fundamentalism,” because anyone who really believes and follows any philosophy is a “fundamentalist” of that philosophy, whether it be Christianity, homeopathic medicine, wildlife conservation, pastafarianism, or whatever. That doesn’t necessarily make that person dangerous (weird, in some cases, but possibly harmless).

    If that philosophy happens to be “Islamic Jihad,” though, then we have a problem. The problem is Islamic Jihad, not the “fundamentalism.”

Speak Your Mind


This comment section is for the readers of Ft. Hard Knox, a place for political conservatives to share information about online activism. We are not "fair and balanced," and we aren't refereeing a "free speech zone." Intelligent, funny, and on-topic comments are welcome. Trolls, spam, and liberal propaganda are not. We may occassionally approve a comment with an obvious lefty-slant so that we can amuse ourselves by making fun of it, but most will be deleted. (Why? Because we're busy, we have lives, and when we want to talk to you we'll go visit you on Digg or the Daily KOS.)

This is a private blog, and we reserve the right to make up our own rules as we go along. The few comments which manage to squeak by our censors reflect the opinion of the commentator, and not necessarily the staff of Ft. Hard Knox.

...and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

Bad Behavior has blocked 2193 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Login