Court Rules Citizens Do NOT Have Standing to Sue to Enforce the Constitution

October 29, 2008 by forthardknox  
Filed under News and Opinion

Received by e-Mail from Richard A. Viguerie:

In a disturbing case with ominous implications for our democratic rights, U.S. Judge R. Barclay Surrick granted a motion by Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee to dismiss a challenge to Obama’s constitutional qualifications to run for President on grounds that a mere citizen does not have legal standing to sue.

Philip Berg, a Democrat and former Assistant Attorney General for Pennsylvania, brought suit alleging that under the Natural Born Citizen Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Obama is ineligible to be President.

Judge Surrick states that citizens may not sue to enforce the Constitution without statutory authorization from Congress.

That concept would result in tyranny.

In American Thinker, Mark Fitzgibbons writes a legal critique of Judge Surrick’s ruling at American Thinker.

Also see: Could this be the REAL reason Obama is in Hawaii? (Update – The Plot Thickens?!)

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. [...] to run for President for some time now. I have watched the arrogant Courts say that a citizen has no business complaining about it and is not impacted by a fraud. I am now seeing multiple lawsuits about Obama’s [...]



Comments

2 Responses to “Court Rules Citizens Do NOT Have Standing to Sue to Enforce the Constitution”
  1. Tom from Florida says:

    What the justices fail to remember is that the “citizens” they are talking about are their bosses. We pay their salaries. If the boss asks their worker to make sure the customers they are serving meet the government laws (ex. old enough to buy beer) then that is what they need to do. If not they will be fired.
    Fired is exactly what we need to do with these arrogant do nothings.

Speak Your Mind


This comment section is for the readers of Ft. Hard Knox, a place for political conservatives to share information about online activism. We are not "fair and balanced," and we aren't refereeing a "free speech zone." Intelligent, funny, and on-topic comments are welcome. Trolls, spam, and liberal propaganda are not. We may occassionally approve a comment with an obvious lefty-slant so that we can amuse ourselves by making fun of it, but most will be deleted. (Why? Because we're busy, we have lives, and when we want to talk to you we'll go visit you on Digg or the Daily KOS.)

This is a private blog, and we reserve the right to make up our own rules as we go along. The few comments which manage to squeak by our censors reflect the opinion of the commentator, and not necessarily the staff of Ft. Hard Knox.

Hint: One sure-fire way to get your comment sent directly to the "spam" folder is to call us "racists" for disagreeing with a policy of the current POTUS or speaking out against terrorism.

Your photo will display with your comment if you use gravatars.

Bad Behavior has blocked 2060 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Login