Court Rules Citizens Do NOT Have Standing to Sue to Enforce the Constitution
October 29, 2008 by forthardknox
Filed under News and Opinion
Received by e-Mail from Richard A. Viguerie:
In a disturbing case with ominous implications for our democratic rights, U.S. Judge R. Barclay Surrick granted a motion by Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee to dismiss a challenge to Obama’s constitutional qualifications to run for President on grounds that a mere citizen does not have legal standing to sue.
Philip Berg, a Democrat and former Assistant Attorney General for Pennsylvania, brought suit alleging that under the Natural Born Citizen Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Obama is ineligible to be President.
Judge Surrick states that citizens may not sue to enforce the Constitution without statutory authorization from Congress.
That concept would result in tyranny.
In American Thinker, Mark Fitzgibbons writes a legal critique of Judge Surrick’s ruling at American Thinker.
Also see: Could this be the REAL reason Obama is in Hawaii? (Update – The Plot Thickens?!)


![[del.icio.us]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Facebook]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/twitter.png)
![[Email]](http://forthardknox.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)







[...] to run for President for some time now. I have watched the arrogant Courts say that a citizen has no business complaining about it and is not impacted by a fraud. I am now seeing multiple lawsuits about Obama’s [...]