Obama’s Civilian Security Force – The Sturm Obamung?

October 29, 2008 by Zap Brannigan  
Filed under News and Opinion

The Sturm Obamung?

I really am getting creeped out by this guy. And beyond the whole “kids singing songs about how hes going to “change it…and re-arrange it…” there’s now this whole thing about a national civilian security force.

In Munich in late 1920, Hitler created the Ordnertruppen, a body of ex-soldiers and beer hall brawlers in order to protect gatherings of the Nazi party from disruptions from Social Democrats and Communists.

In the year 2070 are we going to read history books about the Sturm Obamung “protecting Democrat Party gatherings from disruption by the Conservatives and Christians”?

I encourage all of you who read this to pick up a history book, or even a wiki, and read up on the civilian security force that existed in 1920-30’s Germany, the Sturm Abteilung.

One of my favorite lines from the wiki page for the SA -

After Hitler took power in 1933, the SA became increasingly eager for power and saw themselves as the replacement for the German army. This angered the regular army (Reichswehr) who already resented the Nazi party. It also led to tension with other leaders within the party who saw Röhm’s increasingly powerful SA as a threat to their own personal ambitions. Originally an adjunct to the SA, the Schutzstaffel (SS) was placed under the direct control of Heinrich Himmler in part to restrict the power of the SA and their leaders.

Even if you think I am a bit alarmist about a Sturm Obamung, ask youself if you want an armed and empowered group of individuals of the type that Obama draws to him running around your city, righting “wrongs”. What would their mandate be? Would they take oaths to protect and defend the Constitution, or the President himself? Who would make up this force, a bunch of “Recreate 68″ types? Because thats just the type that ended up manning the SA, folks. Rowdys that basically wanted to create chaos for its own sake.

Each state already has a civilian defense force, its called the National Guard. Each city already has a police department. Ask yourself what is the Sturm Obamungs purpose?


Also see: Michelle Malkin – Voter fraud chic at The Gap and Jenn Sierra – Say, what?! A $400B National Security Force? (Updated)

UPDATE: Apparently he could just absorb the Black Panthers and have them “secure” the polling places.

YouTube Preview Image

I wonder if The One will come out and condemn this act of voter intimidation? Yeah…right…

Comments

10 Responses to “Obama’s Civilian Security Force – The Sturm Obamung?”
  1. jen says:

    I totally agree! NO Sturm Obamungs! Though I could totally see it from mr. socialist. God help us all.

  2. Jenn Sierra Jenn Sierra says:

    Amen, Jen! Good post, Zap.

  3. bhuddamonk says:

    I hardly call a group of young college age kids the modern SA. If those kids came up against a well trained unit of U.S. Soldiers they would get dominated. I’m worried much less about the “Sturm Obamungs” as opposed to Blackwater mercs roaming the streets of New orleans after Hurricane Katrina. The good ole Bush administration threw posse Commitatus right out the window on that one.

    I’m totally for the people of this great country policing themselves. Part of the problem is that we as a people have lost faith in the “police departments” to protect us. Its sad but necessary that at some point, we have to rise up and keep each other safe from our own government. If you rely on the police to protect you you are a fool.

    Every citizen should be a soldier. This was the case with the Greeks and Romans, and must be that of every free state.
    -Thomas Jefferson

  4. Jenn Sierra Jenn Sierra says:

    “Blackwater mercs”?! Where on earth are you getting your news, bhuddamonk?! Oh, right, at Obama rallies, I suppose.

    The biggest problem in Katrina were the gangs of street thugs, looting, and shooting at the rescue helicopters That was actually documented on film, unlike the outrageous rumors about soldiers and cops, which in the end, turned out to be just that – unsubstantiated rumors.. The street thugs are the same folks that Obama wants to round up and use as his minions to usher in the new Obamareich.

  5. Dale G says:

    Dude, the Blackwater security personnel were hired to protect federal properties. The government or private entities sign contracts with them to protect private and government property. I’d much rather see someone guarding a building for money than busting skulls for ideology.

  6. Kim says:

    I’ll be honest up front with you, you’re probably not going to agree with me and that’s okay, but hear me out.

    That ‘kids for Obama’ video was put together as a scare-bomb: it was intended to mock up Obama’s popularity and freak certain people out. Like much of what’s on the Internet, it wasn’t what it purported to be; that was an incredibly creepy video and a person would be mad to think it could convince people to follow its purported message. Reverse psychology has been heavily used in advertising and campaigning, and that’s what that video was.

    If you disbelieve this, try to find a copy of it where the person uploading it didn’t call it ‘creepy’ or in some way reference Nazis. Everyone who posted that video brought up the Nazis, there wasn’t a single upload that was serious about it. The left wasn’t responsible.

    It was cleverly done, but keep in mind that all Presidential elections are psy-ops campaigns. There aren’t any plans in the Obama camp to turn American children into the Hitler Youth. No sane American politician would touch national socialism in any form with a ten-foot-pole.

    On the other hand, our personal freedoms, judicial safety and privacy are at historic lows right now. At any time, you could be accused of terrorism on virtually any basis and held without trial or representation, and you don’t get to bring your guns to defend yourself when they bring you in. That’s happened already to American citizens, usually because they were protesting: and you might not agree with today’s protesters, but you should protect your right to protest all the same: if a leftist ticket that you don’t agree with should win the Presidency, you should have the right to protest without being labeled a terrorist.
    If you think it can’t happen to you, then Germany of the ’30s may have a lesson for you there.

    Don’t be scared back into that corral by a mock-up video of creepy little kids. These guys are not on your side: they don’t want you hand in hand with them, they want you in that corral where they can use you and direct you. Unless you’re a banker who’s honestly benefiting from them, don’t go into their corral over their lame psych-out tactics, your very real freedoms are being stolen from your back pocket while you fret about this. You’re not in the club: you’re the proletariat to them, the unwashed masses, like it or not. If they can use you they will.

    I’m not telling you to vote in one way or another, but keep your eyes on *all* these guys, and judge fascist intentions by fascist acts.

  7. bhuddamonk says:

    First off, thanks for not censoring my post and allowing discourse on the topic. Secondly, I think you’re making alot of assumptions Jenn. I got the “news” directly off of Blackwater’s website:

    http://www.blackwaterusa.com/btw2005/archive/090505btw.html

    The reports on the ground is that they were confiscating firearms of citizens attempting to protect themselves from the very roaming gangs of thugs that were preying on the law abiding populace. Do the research yourself, don’t trust what I’m saying, Google “Blackwater + Katrina” and come up with your own conclusions.

    In addition, I am not an Obama supporter. It would be ideal to have intelligent discourse without using “Leftist” and “Liberal” overtones. I bet you $1 USD that I own twice as many firearms as you do. I know my rights, and because I am an informed citizen doesn’t mean I’m a Obama supporter.

  8. Jenn Sierra Jenn Sierra says:

    Kim – you’ve made some good points, but the creepy kid video is probably the wrong example for them, because the Obama campaign was actually running that one on their website – they were proud of it.

    Bhuddamonk, I really do believe that most of the “Nazi cop” stories that have been circulated about the National Guard, Blackwater, and the Louisiana and New Orleans police have been debunked, or are at the very least unsubstantiated.

    Nonetheless, to the degree which it may have been true that civilian weapons were confiscated from law-abiding New Orleans residents – I agree with you. Hurricane Katrina’s aftermath was a prime example of why civilians need the right to carry weapons, to defend themselves.

    But inexusable behavior on the part of legitimate cops acting under dire (and very unusual circumstances) does not does not indicate that we need Obama’s version of “brownshirts” roaming the neighborhoods.

  9. Within minutes after this was posted in Right Truth yesterday the video was pulled from Utube, but the transcript highlights are on my webpage.

    After spending nine years in Navy Intelligence as a Cryptologist, intercepting communications from Marxist/Socialist countries, breaking their codes, and gathering intelligence in “other” ways. I am familiar with their methods of using the media for propangada, using the educational system to indoctrinate young minds, using the judicial system, and voter fraud to steal elections.
    This is what is happening now in america.

    From everything I have researched in the last two years, has lead me to conclude that Obama was selected, tutored, groomed, scripted, and financed by Radical Marxist/Socialists to become the puppet leader of the USSA.

    There is a vast difference between Social Democrats and Radical Marxist/Socialists. Hillary Clinton is a Social Democrat. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Schumer, Durbin, Franks,Boxer, and a few others now in Congress are Radical Marxist/Socialists.

    On my website: [valsword.spaces.live.com] I have a 16 minute video of an interview with Yure Bezmenov a KGB agent who defected in 1970. This interview was recorded 24 years ago,
    and the transcript highlights, in Yuri’s own words confirm what I mentioned in the first paragraph.

    I pray that I am wrong, but from everything I have researched, I believe Obama, with a Reid Pelosi led Congress, with a radical judicial system will pull a Hugo Chavez.

    In a recent address to his subjects, carried by fiat on all of the nation’s television channels, Venezuela’s authoritarian president Hugo Chávez Frias, who has previously taken over the airways for the celebration of his own birthday, now turned his country’s attention to more urgent matters. The time had come, he explained, to move the “Bolivarian revolution” from its Lenin-like beginnings of transitional capitalism towards a more robust command economy. The nation had at last “broken the chains of the old, exploitative capitalist system,” he said. “The state now has the obligation to build the model of a socialist economy.”
    The next stage of the socialist revolution will require making thirty-three separate amendments to the Venezuelan constitution—a document Chávez previously rewrote upon his ascension to Miraflores Palace in 1999. The most dramatic and controversial change will eliminate presidential term limits, ensuring the fulfillment of Chavez’s promise not to leave office until 2021. To Hugo Chávez, a permanent revolution requires that he wield permanent power. It’s a risky move, considering recent opinion polls showing a majority of Venezuelans skeptical to further constitutional “reform,” especially if it means the possibility of adopting a President Chávez for life. But the same public, polling data demonstrates, also opposed the government’s refusal to renew a broadcast license for RCTV, the country’s oldest and most anti-Chávez private television network, and that storm seems to have passed.

  10. Zap, I also am getting creeped out by The One. Good article. Marion, your comment was most disturbing in light of your stated background, and unfortunately, very believable. I will visit your site.

Speak Your Mind


This comment section is for the readers of Ft. Hard Knox, a place for political conservatives to share information about online activism. We are not "fair and balanced," and we aren't refereeing a "free speech zone." Intelligent, funny, and on-topic comments are welcome. Trolls, spam, and liberal propaganda are not. We may occassionally approve a comment with an obvious lefty-slant so that we can amuse ourselves by making fun of it, but most will be deleted. (Why? Because we're busy, we have lives, and when we want to talk to you we'll go visit you on Digg or the Daily KOS.)

This is a private blog, and we reserve the right to make up our own rules as we go along. The few comments which manage to squeak by our censors reflect the opinion of the commentator, and not necessarily the staff of Ft. Hard Knox.

Hint: One sure-fire way to get your comment sent directly to the "spam" folder is to call us "racists" for disagreeing with a policy of the current POTUS or speaking out against terrorism.

Your photo will display with your comment if you use gravatars.

Bad Behavior has blocked 2104 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Login