Sotomayor Would Reject Herself for Supreme Court

July 14, 2009 by Concerned Women for America  
Filed under News and Opinion

“Confirmation conversion” spotlights the contrast between past opinions and opening testimony

SotomayorDay one of Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s nomination hearing raised eyebrows when her opening statement contrasted with her well- known past opinions.

Sotomayor before the hearings:

Race, gender, and ethnicity “may and will make a difference in our judging.”

The “court of appeals is where policy is made.”

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

Discriminated and ruled against New Haven firefighters in Ricci because of the color of their skin.

Sotomayor’s opening statement:

“In the past month, many Senators have asked me about my judicial philosophy. It is simple: fidelity to the law.”

“The task of a judge is not to make the law — it is to apply the law.”

“My personal and professional experiences help me listen and understand, with the law always commanding the result in every case.”

“Throughout my seventeen years on the bench, I have witnessed the human consequences of my decisions. Those decisions have been made not to serve the interests of any one litigant, but always to serve the larger interest of impartial justice.”

Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee (CWALAC) President Wendy Wright said, “Sotomayor’s new ‘enlightenment’ highlights the radicalism of her previous statements. She suddenly seems to know the proper role of a judge. Yet she purposely violated that responsibility to advance her ideology when the Supreme Court was not in sight.”

Mario Diaz, Esq., CWALAC’s Policy Director for Legal Issues, said,

“Judge Sotomayor knew then, and recognizes now, what we have said all along, that a judge is to follow the law regardless of race and gender. Her opening statement at the hearings not only condemned her own record, it made all those senators we heard defending these unconstitutional statements look foolish.

“If Judge Sotomayor was to follow her new-found wisdom, she could not even support herself based on her record.”

Speak Your Mind


This comment section is for the readers of Ft. Hard Knox, a place for political conservatives to share information about online activism. We are not "fair and balanced," and we aren't refereeing a "free speech zone." Intelligent, funny, and on-topic comments are welcome. Trolls, spam, and liberal propaganda are not. We may occassionally approve a comment with an obvious lefty-slant so that we can amuse ourselves by making fun of it, but most will be deleted. (Why? Because we're busy, we have lives, and when we want to talk to you we'll go visit you on Digg or the Daily KOS.)

This is a private blog, and we reserve the right to make up our own rules as we go along. The few comments which manage to squeak by our censors reflect the opinion of the commentator, and not necessarily the staff of Ft. Hard Knox.

Hint: One sure-fire way to get your comment sent directly to the "spam" folder is to call us "racists" for disagreeing with a policy of the current POTUS or speaking out against terrorism.

Your photo will display with your comment if you use gravatars.

Bad Behavior has blocked 1911 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Login