The Problem with Online Petitions…

August 17, 2009 by Jenn Sierra  
Filed under FHK WebWarriors

Online petitions can be a great way for a group of people to show solidarity with a belief, value, idea, or choice. Until recently, I was a fan of online petitions, because they were a great way to give folks who were relatively new to online activism a voice. I have even expressed on several occasions that one of the benefits of having a substantial, quality online social network is that when you need an online petition signed – you have a way to get the word out quickly. Ft. Hard Knox has promoted a few online petitions, and encouraged political conservatives to sign them.

Ok, Jenn, so what’s your problem today?

I’m glad you asked.

Leftists used online petitions, fundraisers, and websites in the last election season as a very effective phishing tool. Who can forget this: Obama Phishing Expedition Reels in a Whopper? For those that need a reminder, a “phishing” expedition online is the collection and building of a database of names, addresses, phone numbers, e-mail addresses and other personal information. There is some “suspicion” now that those databases are now being used to promote the White House agenda (although this has yet to be proven).

Unfortunately, there are a number of webmasters on the political right who have decided that this tactic worked so well for the left, we might as well do it, too. Politicians and non-profits of every stripe are now shamelessly using the online petition to gain the personal contact info of as many folks as they can. What will this information be used for? Who will it be sold to? It’s hard to know. In many cases, it will simply be used as a contact list the next time that politician or group needs money or a bunch of signatures. In other cases, however, these lists are sold and traded, and there’s no telling where they’ll end up.

I have been bombarded lately with requests to sign online petitions. I occassionally will sign one if I’m familiar with the group or politician, if I’m relatively sure they are actually gathering the information to use to prove a point regarding the “will of the people,” and if I know I’m really not going to mind getting numerous e-mails over the next several months and years from that group or politician. In most cases, however, it is almost impossible to tell who is gathering the information or what they are planning to do with it.

Another problem with all of the online petitions is that they have become a substitute for effective activism. Perhaps we feel like we’ve “done something,” or “made our voice heard,” on an issue by signing one, but a little common sense will tell us that there is a limit to how seriously these online petitions (signed all too often by people using fake names and contact information because of the concerns listed above, or because they are spamming the petitions with multiple entries) will be taken. These internet “petitions” are not at all similar to the signature petitions that are gathered at the local level, and used for grass-roots activism. The effort toward finding, trying to log-on to, and filling out personal information on these online petitions might be more effectively spent on contacting your legislator.

 

Comments

6 Responses to “The Problem with Online Petitions…”
  1. Good thoughts on this Jenn. I think we often sign a petition because a friend asks us too without giving much thought to it.

    As I listened to the White House bumbling around with this “news” this morning, they still cannot explain away true conservatives who got these emails, have never left their name and email address at the White House, or on any Lefty petitions or sites. Perhaps if we go to Daily Kos to leave a little grief – our email might be gathered from someone like them????

    • Jenn Sierra Jenn Sierra says:

      I don’t know, Maggie…that’s a thought.

      We might also consider that if Oministry were obtaining e-mail addresses from sites like the KOS (either through mining the comments or through direct distribution from the site owners), I think it’s more likely that they would simply be gathering data from what they see as a site full of people the majority of which are sympathetic to their cause. Any conservatives on the site would simply be part of the transfer – most likely not the target…? But in either case, this woud be highly unethical behavior, questionably legal, and very difficult to prove.

      There’s some buzz that the White House may be using AOL pop-ups to spread its message here.

      It’ll be interesting to watch how that whole situation shakes out.

  2. Thanks Jenn. Good points and I’ve received emails from two friends who got letters from Axelrod (this latest isn’t the first). I guess Gibby may need to apologize to Major Garrett – on second thought forget that, it’s been a cool summer here in Indiana but no way near the level of hell freezing over.

    • Jenn Sierra Jenn Sierra says:

      Ha ha ha!

      I can’t imagine what it would be like to live in Gibby’s shoes…day, after day, after day having to go on T.V. and spout off rhetoric that you know doesn’t make sense to listeners who know you’re not making sense, all the while keeping a straight face and a fairly good disposition. I almost feel sorry for him. Almost.

  3. Thanks for sharing this info about online petitions. By the way, both my husband and I received Axelrod’s e-mail and we’ve never written to The One at The White House either!

Speak Your Mind


This comment section is for the readers of Ft. Hard Knox, a place for political conservatives to share information about online activism. We are not "fair and balanced," and we aren't refereeing a "free speech zone." Intelligent, funny, and on-topic comments are welcome. Trolls, spam, and liberal propaganda are not. We may occassionally approve a comment with an obvious lefty-slant so that we can amuse ourselves by making fun of it, but most will be deleted. (Why? Because we're busy, we have lives, and when we want to talk to you we'll go visit you on Digg or the Daily KOS.)

This is a private blog, and we reserve the right to make up our own rules as we go along. The few comments which manage to squeak by our censors reflect the opinion of the commentator, and not necessarily the staff of Ft. Hard Knox.

Hint: One sure-fire way to get your comment sent directly to the "spam" folder is to call us "racists" for disagreeing with a policy of the current POTUS or speaking out against terrorism.

Your photo will display with your comment if you use gravatars.

Bad Behavior has blocked 1960 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Login