Twitter’s Left-o-Sphere Spews on Queue

For a prime example of what passes for “debate” in liberal circles these days, one need to do nothing more than do a Google Search or a Twitter Search for “Sally Kern.” Oklahoma State Rep. Sally Kern, in case you don’t remember, found herself rather unintentionally on the front lines of the war on marriage last year when some of her comments to a Republican gathering were recorded, and then played on YouTube and the Ellen DeGeneres show.

Since then, she’s been the target of gay activist groups nationwide, who were unsuccessful in unseating her from her district seat in Oklahoma City in 2008.

What I find incredible is the utter lack of intelligent debate coming from the left on this matter.

Sally’s remarks regarding her support of traditional marriage and family values are always straightforward, consistent, well-documented, and delivered with a respectful tone. Her language is clean, and she does not resort to name-calling, slurs, or derrogatory language. For an example, listen to my interview with her shortly before Christmas last year on Tolerance, ‘Hate Speech,’ and Agendas.

Here’s a more recent example, from an opinion piece by Sally, published in on her website, and in The Oklahoma Gazette, entitled “Preserving Traditional Values“:

For centuries, traditional marriage has been the bedrock institution of society, providing stability and sustainability. Only traditional marriage produces children, which perpetuates future generations.

While same-sex couples can adopt, or be inseminated, this is not the norm. For posterity, society has a vested interest in preserving traditional marriage. Countless studies prove that children thrive best when reared in a home with a mother and a father. Children need the unique qualities that each gender brings into the nuturing process. Also, a monomagamous relationship between a man and a woman helps protect from STD’s.

Biology is important in that same-sex marriage debate. It doesn’t take a genius to know that a man’s and a woman’s body parts naturally fit together. The anatomy of opposite sexes was made to compliment each other. Two men or two women can’t physically compliment one another. There are also other differences between the sexes than just physical. Emotional and psychological differences exist. A man cannot meet all the needs of a man and vice versa.

Homosexuals say same-sex marriage is their civil right, comparing their quest for marriage equality to blacks in their struggle for equality. But homosexuals have always had all the rights of citizenship, unlike blacks. They can vote, own property, hold a job. They’ve never been bought and sold as slaves, or had separate bathrooms or drinking fountains. Homosexuality is not self-evident the way black is.

Homosexuality is not inborn. If it were, from which parent was it inherited? No validated scientific study has ever proven there is a “gay gene.” Everyone is equal and worthy of respect, but not all ideas or behaviors are equal. Granting legal status to a behavior is wrong. Is adultry morally equal to infidelity?

The Bible gives a historical perspective of marriage….Continue reading on The Oklahoma Gazette >>

Perez Hilton (remember him? Here’s a precious video if you need a reminder), and a few other prominent gay marriage activists got a hold of the above opinion piece, and what do you suppose they did? Did they present well-reasoned arguments to counter Rep. Kern’s remarks?

Not exactly. Like Pavlov’s dogs, the liberal automatons began to salivate and spew on queue. See HERE, if you think you have the stomach for it. If not, let’s just say that their comments, sans all of the vile language, boil down to, “Like, I totally can’t believe that stupid, hateful woman said that,” with an enormous amount of re-tweeting of the same.

What inspirational, progressive brilliance!

Religious Citizens Targeted in Alameda, CA for ‘Intolerable’ Views

Karen England, Executive Director of the Capitol Resource Institute in California, writes:

The intolerance against those with religious or traditional moral views is reaching new lows and no where is that clearer than Alameda.

On Tuesday evening the school board in the Bay Area city voted 3-2 to approve curriculum promoting homosexuality to kindergartners, despite vehement and overwhelming opposition from the community. Promoters of the curriculum are so bent on indoctrinating students that they refused a parental op- out provision, even though parents plead for the board to respect their right to protect their children.

“Polling CRI conducted in the city found that over half of city residents opposed the curriculum,” stated Karen England, executive director of CRI. “Even many of those who did support the curriculum still favored a parental opt-out.”

England was present at the last three meetings of the school board after parents contacted CRI’s office and asked for help in stopping the curriculum’s adoption. A veteran of advocating for parental rights at the school board level, England testified on behalf of parents at two of the meetings.

“At this week’s meeting, I heard one of the most outrageous and alarming things I’ve ever heard at any meeting,” commented England. “Alameda school board vice president Ron Mooney actually told parents that the school board will provide no protections for one of the state-mandated protected classes: the religious.”

During the meeting Mooney responded to a question about whether religious students would be respected for disagreeing with the curriculum, he responded that they may disagree, but only at home; they may not carry those views into the classroom.

Placing himself as the arbiter of what is acceptable morality for all people in his district, Mooney asserted that he saw nothing wrong with homosexuality. The general tenor of Mooney and his peers’ remarks reveals that they are themselves intolerant of those with religious beliefs. They knowingly voted for a biased curriculum that specifically excludes religion, turning a deaf ear to the parents who presented cases of religious intolerance in the school district.

Many supporters of the curriculum called opponents bigots and homophobes, engaging in the very name- calling they claim to want to end in their schools. Some even cited religion as the greatest hindrance to stopping bullying and fostering tolerance.

“There is clearly religious bigotry in this district, but it’s not coming from the parents opposing this curriculum- it’s coming directly from the intolerant members of the school board,” explained England. “The board is targeting people of faith, as evidenced by the vice president’s bigoted remarks. Mr. Mooney’s unprofessional behavior gives license to those who engage in the name-calling and bullying parents experienced at these meetings.”

Alameda parents outraged by the complete disregard for the input are discussing how to move forward and hold their elected officials accountable.

Also see:

• Contact the Members of the ASUD Board of Education
• Alameda School District Forces Gay Curriculum
• As California Goes…Alameda, CA needs to hear the clear opposition of people with traditional values.
• ‘Equality for All Children’ Curriculum (Copy)
• San Diego says No Bible Study at Home
• What Happened to the New England Primer and a Slateboard?

 

Gays Start Blacklist of Those Who Supported Prop 8

Gay activists have started a blacklist to destroy those who supported Proposition 8 in California–the measure that supported marriage between a man and a woman.

OK Rep. Sally Kern speaks out about the CA Prop 8 and the homosexual political agenda.

Last March, OK State Rep. Sally Kern (R-OKC) was attacked at the international level for making statements in a private meeting when her comments in that meeting were recorded and uploaded to YouTube. Sally Kern was recently re-elected to her house seat, in spite of the fact that her challenger was partially funded by national gay-rights organizations.

Click here or on the photo to the right to listen to Oklahoma State Representative Sally Kern talk with Chris Medlock on Tulsa’s KFAQ about California Prop 8 which banned gay marriage in that state, and about the homosexual agenda nationally and in Oklahoma.

Also see:

• Podcast: Sally Kern on the Chris Medlock Show
• Michelle Malkin: Who will quell the anti-Prop. 8 rage?
• Orlando: Gay Activists Threaten Old Lady
• D=S: This is what Rep. Kern is fighting to keep from happening in OK….
• Big Dog’s Weblog: Support for Sally Kern of Oklahoma
• Activist: ‘Pastor to presidents’ replaced by gay bishop

Is This Union Label? (Updated)

(Updated with Links)

…from Tony Perkins of the FRC:

Stories of the homosexual lobby intimidating companies and individuals who stand up for man-woman marriage are becoming more and more common:

• In Massachusetts, during a petition drive to get a state marriage amendment on the ballot, homosexual activists called people who signed the petition and threatened them with lawsuits or worse. (VoteOnMarriage.org)
• Boston public school teachers were threatened with termination if they failed to portray so-called homosexual “marriage” in a positive light. (WorldNetDaily)
• Michigan’s largest homosexual activist group says once marriage is legally redefined to include homosexual couples, business owners and even news media outlets that refuse to recognize such marriages should be jailed, or sued and “publicly slapped.” (Americans For Truth)

In California we are hearing similar stories, but now the intimidation tactics are being endorsed by one of the nation’s largest unions — the AFL-CIO. Homosexual advocates, with the powerful backing of national union leaders, are calling for a boycott of Bolthouse Farms, a California company that provides organic juices, lemonades, and smoothies to places like Whole Foods and other organic markets, simply because one of the minority owners donated money to the petition drive to put a marriage amendment on the ballot. (Union Voice)
Read more